No industry since Independence has faced a blanket ban. Tobacco? Restricted. Alcohol? Regulated. But gaming—recognised by the Supreme Court as skill-based—was axed in one stroke.
Aditya Dhar, Associate Partner at Vaish Associates Advocates
When the government passed the Online Gaming Bill in a hurried, debate-free parliamentary session, it did more than outlaw an industry. It signalled to global investors, entrepreneurs, and India’s digital economy at large that policy in the world’s fastest-growing tech market can swing like a pendulum—swift, opaque, and absolute.
The fallout is already visible: more than ₹25,000 crore in value wiped out within days, over one lakh direct and indirect jobs hang in the balance, and global investors have put fresh commitments on ice. For a nation that prides itself on its “Digital India” story, this abrupt move doesn’t just dent credibility—it threatens the very foundation of India’s innovation economy.
No other industry post-Independence has faced a blanket prohibition. Tobacco was restricted, not banned. Alcohol was regulated, not outlawed. Even industries with undeniable social costs—betting on horse racing, lotteries, or gutkha—have survived through regulation or state monopolies. Yet online gaming, a sector recognized by the Supreme Court as involving games of skill in formats such as rummy and poker, has been eliminated in one stroke.
The government justifies the ban on the grounds of addiction, financial distress, and consumer protection. But if addiction or financial distress were the true metrics, alcohol and lotteries—both with far higher social consequences—would have been long gone. The uncomfortable truth is that gaming has become a soft target.
The consequences stretch far beyond balance sheets. India’s gaming industry had become a test case for the country’s ambitions to build global digital products. It attracted billions in FDI, created high-paying tech and creative jobs, and developed export-ready intellectual property. Shutting it down is not merely a policy reversal; it’s an admission that India struggles to regulate complexity.
The vacuum will inevitably be filled by offshore, unregulated operators. We’ve seen this before: post-GST hikes in 2023, illegal platforms flourished by promising players zero taxes and zero TDS. With legitimate domestic companies forced to shut shop, players will now migrate en masse to black-market platforms with no safeguards, no tax contribution, and no accountability. The government’s stated objectives—consumer protection and financial safety—are paradoxically undermined.
What message does this send to global capital? That India, the very market touted as the next digital superpower, can switch off industries overnight without consultation or phased transitions. Venture funds and strategic investors who once saw India as a high-growth opportunity will now hesitate. The chilling effect will not stop at gaming; it will ripple across fintech, e-commerce, and emerging tech, where regulatory uncertainty already looms.
History offers a clear verdict: prohibition is a blunt instrument that rarely achieves its intended outcomes. The United States’ alcohol prohibition in the 1920s only fueled bootlegging and crime. India’s own experiments with state-level liquor bans have consistently given rise to thriving black markets. Gaming will be no different. By refusing to understand the complexity of regulation, the government has ceded the space to entities outside its reach, eroding tax revenues and exposing consumers to unregulated risks.
The irony is that India didn’t need to go down the path of prohibition at all. A regulatory framework could have done the heavy lifting—tools like age verification, spending caps, mandatory self-exclusion features, and clear tax rules are already in place in mature markets across the world. These don’t just protect players, they also ensure that the industry grows responsibly while contributing to the economy.
By choosing an outright ban, India has effectively thrown away the chance to build a global blueprint for responsible gaming. Instead of shaping the industry, we’ve shut the door on it, pushing players towards unsafe platforms and investors towards safer markets.
The loss is bigger than gaming—it is about whether India has the patience and foresight to govern new-age industries thoughtfully, or whether we will continue to fall back on blunt bans that solve little and cost plenty.
Empower your business. Get practical tips, market insights, and growth strategies delivered to your inbox
By continuing you agree to our Privacy Policy & Terms & Conditions
